I AM THE Science
Paraphrased from:
Two years ago, the geniuses of virology and immunology thought they had discovered the answer to controlling virus infections in humans. Either they were misguided or malicious in their intent.
The mRNA Covid jabs were designed to overcome evolution and make humans do something they had NOT evolved to do. The vaccines fooled our immune systems into a much more powerful response to Sars-Cov-2 than it would have otherwise, producing supra-naturally high levels of IgG antibodies.
Those super-high antibody levels were intended to be a feature, not a bug. They were the reason the mRNAs suppressed infection. The problem is that vaccination is not supposed to increase the death rate for a disease.
A German paper (referenced below) published 2022 now explains why. Briefly, there are four types of Immunoglobulin G that together represent 75% of the serum antibodies in humans. IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 normally constitute 99.96% of the Immunoglobulin G in circulation. IgG4 is normally the balance of 0.04%.
What the German study found was that vaccination caused the proportion of IgG4 to rise after the second dose and again after the third dose to near 40% in some individuals. Why this is a bad thing is because the role of IgG4 is to stop the immune system from overreacting to allergens like pollen. What this means in covid is that the IgG4 antibodies will bind to the covid virions and stop the rest of the immune system from attacking them. In turn, this means a higher covid infection rate and a higher death rate. Post the third dose, those with higher IgG4 levels were more likely to be infected with covid.
Further, we now know that the body quickly returns those antibody levels to normal.
Worse, if we force the lgG4 higher again with repeated booster shots, our immune system will respond by producing a kind of antibody normally seen primarily as a response to non-replicating allergens, not viruses.
In other words, our immune systems appear to respond very unfavourably in the long run to the provocation from the mRNAs.
Science Immunology, 22 Dec 2022, Vol 8, Issue 79: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798
Past unsuccessful attempts to elicit solid protection against mucosal respiratory viruses and to control the deadly outbreaks and pandemics they cause have been a scientific and public health failure.
We are excited and invigorated that many investigators and collaborative groups are rethinking, from the ground up, all of our past assumptions and approaches to preventing important respiratory viral diseases and working to find bold new paths forward.
In Fauci’s words, we made:
an immunologic “Faustian bargain” between tolerance versus infection control [allowing] transient, moderated infection by respiratory agents of low or intermediate pathogenicity to restrain the destructive forces of an immune elimination response.
Fauci helped spearhead the effort to push a new type of vaccine onto the world. After only a few short months of testing, the United States and other countries injected their citizens with more than 3 billion doses of mRNA.
Yet with these words, Fauci is admitting the effort has failed completely. He’s not excluding the mRNAs from “past unsuccessful attempts” that “have been a public health failure.” He’s not saying they can form the basis for “bold new paths.”
A 1999 Fauci quote that highlights the hypocrisy of these recent events is where he discusses the stages in the development of a vaccine, from initial trials of one to two hundred to:
“Now, let’s give it to thousands of people, and then you find out that it takes 12 years for all hell to break loose. And then, what have you done?”
Today, he is washing his hands of the long-term consequences of their failed efforts to rewire the immune system may turn out to be.
Most students of classical literature will know the fateful outcome of entering into a Faustian contract.